Posted on by 1000853754

Mourinho: MU Tak Akan Juara Liga Champions

Pelatih Inter Milan ini optimistis Manchester United [MU] akan lolos ke final Liga Champions.

Jose Mourinho kembali mengeluarkan pernyataan yang bisa memanaskan telinga rivalnya. Selain memberikan kritikan terhadap taktik yang diperagakan Chelsea, Mourinho juga menilai Setan Merah tak bakal menjuarai Liga Champions musim ini.

MU akan menghadapi pertandingan leg kedua semi-final Liga Champions melawan Arsenal di Stadion Emirates dengan modal kemenangan 1-0. Sedangkan Chelsea menjamu Barcelona setelah kedua tim bermain imbang tanpa gol.

“Saya yakin 100 persen Manchester akan lolos. Tapi yang memenangi Liga Champions musim ini adalah pemenang pertandingan semi-final lainnya,” ujar Mourinho dilansirChannel4.

“Chelsea adalah klub yang pernah saya latih, jadi sulit bagi saya untuk berbicara tentang mereka.”

 

“Secara fisik, mereka sangat kuat di dunia. Mereka sudah merasa nyaman karena tidak mencetak gol dan tak kebobolan. Barcelona membuktikan mereka mampu bermain bagus sekalipun di luar kandangnya [kemenangan 6-2 atas Real Madrid], namun Chelsea menjadi tim berbahaya bila tepat menerapkan strategi permainan.”

26,190 Replies to “Mourinho: MU Tak Akan Juara Liga Champions”

  17. Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed
    русское порно жесток
    Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked.

    The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners.

    Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed.

    The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts
    Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss.

    Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses.

    The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson.

    In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.

  24. Greetings! I know this is kind of off topic but I was wondering which blog platform are you using for this website? I’m getting sick and tired of WordPress because I’ve had problems with hackers and I’m looking at options for another platform. I would be awesome if you could point me in the direction of a good platform.

  29. I wanted to thank you for this great read!! I definitely enjoying every little bit of it I have you bookmarked to check out new stuff you post…

  39. Ask for her recommendation if you need her opinion — generally mothers simply know greatest when it comes to making robust selections, like whether or not to ask youngsters to the wedding.

  42. Why expanding the College Football Playoff worked – and what still needs to be fixed
    русское гей порно
    Now that it’s all over and the Ohio State Buckeyes are the college football national champions, it can be definitively said: expanding the College Football Playoff worked.

    The grand experiment to allow more teams to play for the national championship wasn’t perfect, but it ended up where it was supposed to: a worthy national champion with exciting, close games in the later rounds when the best teams faced one another. It gave us awesome scenes on campuses around the nation, created new legends and showed how a sport so steeped in tradition can evolve when faced with new demands from its fans and business partners.

    Here are four reasons why the new version of the College Football Playoff worked – and the areas that can still be fixed.

    The committee picked the right teams, even if some games were blowouts
    Before the games kicked off in December, much of the focus was put on the inclusion of Southern Methodist University (SMU) and Indiana University – two teams that won a bunch of games but didn’t have the brand recognition of schools like Alabama, South Carolina and Ole Miss.

    Here’s what else those teams had that SMU and Indiana didn’t: three losses.

    The Hoosiers lost only once in the regular season – to eventual national champion Ohio State. The Mustangs had lost twice, once to Brigham Young University and again in the ACC championship game to Clemson.

    In the first year of the expanded, 12-team playoff, could the committee really leave out a major conference team with 11 wins and punish another one for playing for a conference championship while other teams sat at home? Warde Manuel, the University of Michigan athletic director who served as chair of the committee, said they could not.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Proudly powered by WordPress