NOKIPHONE

Seberapa hebat jika ponsel iPhone digabung dengan Nokia?. Hasilnya adalah ponsel lengkap yang disebut NokiPhone. Vendor China makin kreatif membuat tiruan ponsel terkenal. Tidak hanya meniru desainnya, ponsel China juga memberikan fitur tambahan yang tidak dimiliki ponsel aslinya.

NokiPhone mengusung desain dual-slide meniru N95 dengan layar sentuh 3,2 inci. Termasuk tersedia kartu dual SIM tapi dengan muka yang lebih mirip iPhone.

Jadi bagi yang masih cinta dengan Nokia dan ingin merasakan iPhone, mungkin akan tertarik dengan ponsel ini. Sayanngnya NokiPhone belum memasukkan 3G atau WiFi pada N3000i.

Tapi NokiPhone mendukung penuh untuk memainkan video, musik dan juga game. Spesifikasinya mengusung layar 3,2 inci, widescreen 16:9, serta QVGA 260k. Sementara fitur dual sim bisa bekerja secara bersamaan.

Ponsel ini memiliki software kelas tinggi mendukung video recorder, photo editor, audio player dan sound recorder. Selain itu bisa memutar MP3 dan MP4. Termasuk memiliki kemampuan SMS group sending, WAP, handwrittinng input, bluetooth, GPRS dan MMS.

29,030 Replies to “NOKIPHONE”

  1. Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
    skraken darknet onion
    Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.

    Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
    Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.

    An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.

    The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.

    And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”

    Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.

    The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.

  2. Great awesome things here. I?¦m very satisfied to peer your post. Thank you a lot and i am looking forward to touch you. Will you kindly drop me a e-mail?

  3. Astronomers briefly thought Elon Musk’s car was an asteroid. Here’s why that points to a broader problem
    skraken зайти
    Seven years after SpaceX launched Elon Musk’s cherry red sports car into orbit around our sun, astronomers unwittingly began paying attention to its movements once again.

    Observers spotted and correctly identified the vehicle as it started its extraterrestrial excursion in February 2018 — after it had blasted off into space during the Falcon Heavy rocket’s splashy maiden launch. But more recently, the car spawned a high-profile case of mistaken identity as space observers mistook it for an asteroid.
    Several observations of the vehicle, gathered by sweeping surveys of the night sky, were inadvertently stashed away in a database meant for miscellaneous and unknown objects, according to the International Astronomical Union’s Minor Planet Center.

    An amateur astronomer noticed a string of data points in January that appeared to fit together, describing the orbit of a relatively small object that was swooping between the orbital paths of Earth and Mars.

    The citizen scientist assumed the mystery object was an undocumented asteroid and promptly sent his findings to the MPC, which operates at the Harvard Smithsonian Center for Astrophysics in Cambridge, Massachusetts, as a clearinghouse that seeks to catalog all known asteroids, comets and other small celestial bodies. An astronomer there verified the finding.

    And thus, the Minor Planet Center logged a new object, asteroid “2018 CN41.”

    Within 24 hours, however, the center retracted the designation.

    The person who originally flagged the object realized their own error, MPC astronomer Peter Veres told CNN, noticing that they had, in fact, found several uncorrelated observations of Musk’s car. And the center’s systems hadn’t caught the error.

  4. Good ?V I should certainly pronounce, impressed with your site. I had no trouble navigating through all tabs and related info ended up being truly easy to do to access. I recently found what I hoped for before you know it at all. Quite unusual. Is likely to appreciate it for those who add forums or anything, website theme . a tones way for your client to communicate. Excellent task..

  5. After research a few of the blog posts on your web site now, and I truly like your approach of blogging. I bookmarked it to my bookmark web site checklist and will be checking again soon. Pls take a look at my site as well and let me know what you think.

  6. Nice post. I learn something more challenging on different blogs everyday. It will always be stimulating to read content from other writers and practice a little something from their store. I’d prefer to use some with the content on my blog whether you don’t mind. Natually I’ll give you a link on your web blog. Thanks for sharing.

  7. Thanks, I’ve just been searching for info about this topic for ages and yours is the greatest I’ve found out till now. But, what concerning the bottom line? Are you certain in regards to the source?

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *